![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Member #: 6282
Location: Newberry, MI
My Sled: 2005 RS Rage
Posts: 10
![]() |
Does anyone know what the travel is on the rear suspension of the original Phazer (not Phazer II)? Thanks. -- Stu
__________________
1995 Phazer II 2005 RS Rage |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Mini
Join Date: Nov 2004
Member #: 2161
Location: SLC UT
My Sled: 84/86 Phazer
Posts: 61
![]() |
I believe it was a whopping 6-7".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Member #: 6282
Location: Newberry, MI
My Sled: 2005 RS Rage
Posts: 10
![]() |
6" good, 7" not so much. We have a local "one lunger" race that allows for 6" of suspension travel MAX and one of the racers is interested in buying the rear suspension out of my parts sled to use in his race sled.
__________________
1995 Phazer II 2005 RS Rage |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
ProStock
Join Date: Mar 2005
Member #: 3094
My Sled: Phazer, Ventures
Posts: 677
![]() |
6 inches was a lot when that sled was new.
The limiter strap can be used to limit the travel to whatever you want. Remember that suspension is for a 116 inch track. It can probably be mounted to work with a 121. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Member #: 6282
Location: Newberry, MI
My Sled: 2005 RS Rage
Posts: 10
![]() |
The limiter strap is the problem they are having now actually. They are using a ski-doo suspension with 10" of travel and using the limiter strap to get only 6" of travel. The team believes that this is working against them and causing a harsher ride.
__________________
1995 Phazer II 2005 RS Rage |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|